Wednesday, December 10, 2014

In-Memory Analytics: A Faster Computing Method



“In-memory computing will have a long term, disruptive impact by radically changing users’ expectations, application design principles, products’ architecture and vendors’ strategy”
Donald Feinberg, Gartner VP and Distinguished Analyst

“In-memory is just a hype spread out by SAP”

Introduction:
Be it the support for the increase in bets from 12000 per second to 15000 per second for the online gaming company Bwin.party, the near-real-time insight into product availability for customers by the retailer Edgenet or be it the response by ConAgra, an $18 billion-a-year consumer package good company to the fluctuating costs of 40,000 raw material, the in-memory analytics made it possible.  Before going to the business aspect of in-memory analytics let’s have a look into what is in-memory analytics and how it is helping business to grow faster?

In-memory analytics facilitates querying of data from Random Access Memory (RAM) instead of physical disk. Data can be loaded from multiple source into the system memory directly. This helps in faster processing of data and faster business decision. Following figure depicts the general difference between the Traditional Computing and In-Memory computing.



Types:
There are 5 types of In-Memory analytics and they are:




Major Industry Drivers:
The figure bellow shows powerful drivers push organizations towards In-memory analytics.


The first and foremost driver for In-memory analytics is Big Data. To handle wide volume, velocity and variety of data faster computing technology is required and In-Memory is the need of the time. Real-time analytics is the second and an important driver. To make faster, accurate business decisions, organizations are relying on the real-time analytics and In-memory analytics makes it easy. Another driver for this new technology is the need of scalability and flexibility that required for the business. In the other hand some factors are there standing as hindrance for this technology to adopt. Among them lack of knowledge and development, security challenges are main hinders.

Value Creation:
The four dimensions of the value created by In-Memory Analytics are:
1. Performance: The time taken for data analysis comes down drastically from hours to seconds. In-Memory Analysis allowed levering the most recent data for the purpose of analysis and informed decisions.
2. Process innovation: The performance gain gives space for innovation in various application and it leads to competitive advantage for the organization.
3. Simplification: Due to reduction in layer the complexity of data models can be reduced significantly. This simpler architecture reduces the sources of potential error.
4. Flexibility: During analysis new data source can easily be plugged in as an additional source of information and this provide flexibility to the data analysis.

Adaptation Rate:
As per a survey done by Deloitte (German CIOs) 52% of respondents said that they are still evaluating the IMA technology, where as 22% CIOs said that they are on the plot and only 4% said they have adopted this technology. The bellow graph shows the break down:



Conclusion:
IMA is the future of computing but requires a clear strategy for all steps from evaluation to implementation. This includes, but is not limited to, the identification and evaluation of opportunities for the utilization of IMA, business case development, management of the implementation as well as learning and change management for pilot scheme and roll out.    

References:



           

Wednesday, December 3, 2014

The Firefox Dilemma


The recent news about Firefox has created a buzz in the Internet market. Firefox has dropped Google as the global default search engine provider and selected Yahoo for the U.S Market. Is it a correct strategy for Firefox? How much Firefox going to earn from Yahoo in future? Will it be a sustainable partnership? Before going to answer these questions let's get into an in depth analysis of the web browsers and search engine market.

Web Browser Market:


The figure-1 depicts the October 2014 market share of the major Internet browsers. Clearly Google Chrome is the market leader with 40.8% of market share, followed by Internet Explorer (IE) and Mozilla Firefox with 17.9% and 16.0% market share respectively. There are two typical revenue models for any Internet browser:
1.      Revenue from search royalty: The browser company gets royalty from the search engine providers. When someone searches anything using the search engine and search engine generate revenue from the ads. This revenue is shared between the web or Internet browser provider. And a major chunk of revenue for web browser comes from this channel.
2.      Fix licensing fee for pre-installed browser on the mobile/handset: This a secondary way of revenue generation. Think about a scenario when you buy any mobile device there are certain pre-installed applications. The manufacturer of the mobile phone has to pay certain amount as the licensing fee to the application developer. So whenever any browser is pre-installed in any mobile device, then the manufacturer pays to the web browser company. 

Search Engine Market:

We can get insight about the Search Engine Market Share data from Figure-2(a) and Figure-2(b). Clearly Google is the market leader in case of desktop as well as mobile and tablet platform. At the same time Yahoo stands 3rd in the desktop space behind Baidu (The Chinese Google) and 2nd in the mobile platform.

Mozilla Firefox: 
Mozilla Firefox is an open-source web browser, available for Windows OS, Linux OS and Mac OS. It also operates in the mobile space providing web browser for Android OS. It was initially released on September 23, 2002. The current revenue of Mozilla Firefox is $314 Million and it is up by just 1% from last year revenue. A major chunk, around 90% of this revenue comes from Google. Figure-3 shows the year-on-year revenue of Mozilla Firefox and figure-4 shows the revenue from Google.                      



Partnership with Google:

As per a press release by Mozilla- “Firefox users alone search the web more than 100 billion times per year”. Google has been the global default search engine for Firefox since 2004. This 10 year-long partnership came to an end in this year (2014). Keeping the values of choice and independence in mind Firefox dropped Google as the default search engine. As per Mozilla it is a strategic decision. But I don't think so. Because it is called "RIVALRY".

Google introduced Google Chrome, a free-ware web browser in September 2, 2008. And gradually Chrome has eaten up the market share of Firefox. And on the year 2012 Chrome tapped into the 46.90% of total browser market share and became the market leader. Mozilla became the market follower. Again in 2014, IE over passed Firefox and became the challenger for Chrome. Figure-5 shows the year on year market share of Mozilla and Firefox. The growth of Google in the search engine market as well as in the web browser market has created problem for many organizations. Yahoo and Firefox are affected by it. As per the new strategic initiative a collaborative partnership between Yahoo and Firefox will strive to regain the past glory
  





This the new ad campaign by Firefox named as "Choose Independent".


Friday, November 14, 2014

Brand Equity Study of Motorola

“Motorola exists to invent, build and deliver the best mobile device on the planet, improving the lives of millions of people”

-Vision Statement of Motorola

1.      RESEARCH OBJECTIVE:

This research project is carried out to evaluate the Brand Equity of Motorola mobility.

2.      RESEARCH METHODOLOGY:

The research was carried out in two stages. The first one is secondary research, followed by the in-depth interview with the Moto G users. 10 in-depth interviews were conducted where the questions are asked about the brand identity of the Moto G and about the customer perception.

3.      ABOUT MOTOROLA MOBILITY:

Motorola is an American telecommunication device manufacturer based at Chicago. They created the world’s first commercial portable cellular phones. On August 2011 Google acquired Motorola mobility division for US$12.5 billion. During 2003 to 2007, worldwide Motorola was one of the leading mobile phone manufacturer. But due to lack of product innovation, continuous improvement, Motorola lost its significant market share. Apart from Moto Razr, Motorola failed to cater the changing need of the customers. But in the late 2013, the introduction of moto G, moto E and moto X (the android versions) resulted some eye-catching results for Motorola. Moto Razr was the biggest success for Motorola. Around 130 million units of moto Razr was sold during 2003 to 2006. 

4.      GLOBAL MOBILE PHONE MARKET:

The global mobile phone market is one of the most competitive and highly volatile market. And in the era of smartphone, technologies change very rapidly as well as the customer preferences. The current valuation (2014) of the global smartphone market is around US$150.3 billion. And the following shows the market share wise breakup for the major brands:



A current report on the ranking of smartphones as per the brand preferences reviles that Apple stands out as most preferred brand for smartphones followed by Samsung and Nokia. Motorola is the number eight in the brand preference list.  


Once pioneer and market leader of mobile phones, Motorola is way behind its competitors to attract the tech savvy customers. The following figure shows the perceptual map (by June 2013) for the global smart phone brands:


We can clear observe that Motorola is catering to the mass market and the durability is unquestionable but it lacks the feature end as well as style and design to attract the youth. Whereas Sony, Nokia and Apple phones are more stylish and trendy and the market leader Samsung is highly equipped with many features.
To analyze the problem, let’s look at the consumer buying journey for any budget smartphone.    

      5.      CONSUMER BUYING JOURNEY:

The following shows the funnel for consumer decision journey for any product.
It all started with customers awareness set of brand, followed by Familiarity set of brands, then the consideration set and purchase set. Finally the consumer moves to loyalty. If we follow the above funnel method for any budget smartphone buying, then a hypothetical funnel may look like as given below:


The awareness set of budget smartphone contains eight models from Samsung, Micromax, Nokia, Motorola, Asus, Xiaomi, HTC and Lenovo. Moving along the funnel, the purchase set contains three brands: Nokia, Samsung and Motorola.
The customers always consider any brand in their purchase set when they have a clear and strong imagery for the brands.

       6.      NEW MOTO SERIES:

The new moto series of smartphones are launched in the later part of 2013. Moto X was unveiled on August 2013, followed by Moto G on 13th November 2013 and Moto E was launched on 13th May 2014. The sole objective of introducing these low end budget smartphone is to tap the growing price sensitive young segments. These models are initially launched in developing market like Latin America and South-East Asia, subsequently they are launched in the developed markets.    

       7.      THE TRINITY OF BRAND STRATEGY:

The current brand strategy of Motorola can be analyzed by using the trinity of brand strategy.


       7.1   VALUE PROPOSITION:

“Value for money” is the value proposition for Moto G.

       7.2   POSITIONING:


The Brand Mantra for Moto G is “Exceptional Phone, Exceptional Price”. Like many other smartphone it has various common features like Android OS, Dual SIM, Feature loaded, google play enabled etc. The PODs of Moto G is the only phone as of now provides latest android OS (ver. 4.4.2/KitKat) Ergonomic design and Google OK in a very attractive price. If we look into the substantiator: 1million Moto G are sold in India in 5 months.      

       7.3   BRAND IDENTITY:





The above depicts the brand identity prism for Moto G. The rallying cry for Moto G is “Good things come in small packages”. The Capabilities of Moto G are the aesthetic, up to dated OS, good user interaction. The personality (human traits) of Moto G are young, resourceful and honest. The shared values are “value for money” and “Express Yourself”. The aspirational self-image that Moto G has smart, up to date and efficient. The Noble Purpose is “Access to all” and the Internal Culture and Value is “Uncompromised value & quality”  

8.RAND ELEMENTS:



The above shows three brand elements of Motorola. The slogan “Intelligence Everywhere” the brand name and the new logo.

A recent survey reviles that the association of Motorola with Google created a hype in the market and positive response from the market.

        9.      VERDICT:    

Brands are intangible. They are difficult to isolate, hard to measure. There are no simple formulas for measuring a brand’s “return,” or—when cared for poorly—measuring its drag on financial performance. But a brand’s intangibility is also what makes it so valuable (and in turn makes a sensitive measurement tool for brands all the more valuable).


Differentiation is the catalyst for action in brand development. It’s the first step to the other Pillars of the Brand. Motorola believes in making fewer-but more differentiated-Android devices
The second step in brand development is Relevance. If a brand isn’t relevant, or personally appropriate to consumers, it isn’t going to attract and keep them. Differentiation can lead to a fling, but without a belief that there is a relevant connection to one’s own life, a consumer won’t engage in a serious long-term loyalty. Relevance means Motorola standing for something. Rather than trying to become everything to everybody with a “game changer” handset as per old Motorola’s strategy, the new strategy is to be relevant to the consumer’s everyday needs .Motorola currently focuses on giving consumers better tools to tell their own story. Motorola’s mantra currently is “Doing common things uncommonly well”.
The third key measure identified is Esteem— the extent to which consumers like a brand and hold it in high regard. Esteem relates to how well a brand fulfills its implied or overtly stated consumer promise. It doesn’t occur without Differentiation and Relevance having preceded it, but it can outlive those Pillars by many years. In regards to this dimension being one the oldest brand in the field and being known for its uncompromising quality puts Motorola on a positive stead.
If a brand has established its Relevant Differentiation and consumers come to hold it in high Esteem, brand Knowledge is the outcome. High Knowledge means consumers understand and have internalized what the brand stands for. Motorola has reached this stage in the mind of the customers.

       10.      REFERENCES:

  • Chawla, D. & Sondhi, N. (2011). Research Methodology Concepts and Cases. New Delhi: Vikash Publishing House Pvt. Ltd.
  • Kotler, P. & Keller, K.L. (2012). Marketing Management. Fourteenth Edition. New Jersey: Pearson Education Inc.
  • Motorola (n.d.).Company Profile. Retrieved August 21, 2014 http://www.motorola.com/us/About-Motorola/Corporate-About-Motorola.html
  • Motorola (n.d.).Company Profile. Retrieved August 20, 2014 http://www.motorola.com/us/consumers/about-motorola-us/About_Motorola-Corporate_Overview/About_Motorola-Corporate_Overview.html
  • TOI Tech. (2014, Feb 07) Moto G vs top three rivals Retrieved August 19, 2014, http://timesofindia.indiatimes.com/tech/slideshow/moto-g-vs-top-three-rivals/itslideshowviewall/30003600.cms
  • http://www.flipkart.com/motorola?otracker=hp_nmenu_sub_electronics_0_Motorola
  • http://www.marketsandmarkets.com/PressReleases/smartphones-market.asp
  • http://phys.org/news/2014-02-nokia-blackberry-motorola-lost-glory.html
  • http://www.labbrand.com/knowledge/labreport/brand-positioning-strategies-rising-chinese-smartphone-brands      
  • http://www.mckinsey.com/insights/marketing_sales/the_consumer_decision_journey
  • http://www.brandamplitude.com/blog/item/value-proposition-brand-identity-and-positioning-why-your-brand-needs-all-three
  • http://timesofindia.indiatimes.com/tech/tech-news/Flipkart-sells-1-million-Motorola-phones-in-5-months/articleshow/38093792.cms
  • http://www.amzer.com/blog/2013/06/motorola-mobility-gets-colourful-new-logo-with-official-google-association/           
  • http://web.pdx.edu/~sbaweb/faculty/ahutinel/Read/5.pdf

Thursday, November 13, 2014

Android One: Is it a marketing mistake in India?

On September 15, 2014 Google launched its most awaited project Android One in India and subsequently in various emerging markets in Asia Pacific and Latin America. The sole motive of this project is to tap the major chunk of 5 billion population of the world, known as “The Next Billion” who has never used mobile phone. The current trend in Indian market shows that Android One is struggling a lot and unable to compete with Chinese company like Xiaomi and Motorola. Is it a marketing mistake by Google in India or has Google misunderstood the Indian Customers? Before going into details let’s have a look into some facts about Android One.

Android One is the stock android version (without any customization) mainly targeted towards customers buying the first ever smartphone and developers. The main benefit of Android One is that it is standardized and requires minimum hardware so the cost of the smartphones are very low ranging from 100 to 110 USD. Last but not the least it will get android update as soon as google will release one. Why it is needed? Well, the Android market has got fragmented as various companies have developed their own version of Android by making some changes in the stock android (like new GUI, pre-loaded third party apps etc.) to make it more appealing. So Google was losing its ground and wanted to control its OS like Apple does. That’s why Android One came up.

With a great marketing campaign, strategic partnership with Indian players like Micromax, Karbonn and Spice, Google launched Android One in a grand manner. The price of these smartphones are around 6000 INR to 6500 INR. For the first 15 days of September total 2.3 lakh handsets are shipped but it went down to 2 lakh in the month of October. According to IDC, roughly 8 million smartphones are shipped into India, of which only 2.5% is Android One.

Model
Sep-14
Oct-14
Micromax Canvas A1
119000
132460
Spice Dream Uno
43100
34791
Karbonn Sparkle V
67440
34390






(Imported Number of Android One Devices Source: Cybex Exim Solution)

It is very difficult to say whether Android One is a success or not looking into this trend of two months but it is sure that, it is not doing as expected by the pundits. Let’s use the 4P concept of marketing to analyze it.

Product: Google choice to use minimum hardware back fired it. The MediaTek 1.3GHz quad-core lacks behind the performance of a 1.2 GHz quad-core Qualcomm Snapdragon or a 1.2 GHz dual-core Intel Atom. Apart from the processor, for an Android OS 1700 mAh battery is very low. The camera quality (2MP) in those handsets is also not that great.

Price: The pricing strategy for the Android One is good but the stiff competition made it more difficult. Mobile producers like Xiaomi (Redmi 1s), Motorola (Moto E) are providing better mobile experience within the same price range. So low priced strategy didn’t work properly.

Promotion: Targeting the Tier-II and Tier-III cities in India, the promotion are not so extensive in the traditional media. Apart from some TV ads, launch day newspaper ad not much promotion is there for the target customer. So it could not leveraged it properly.

Place: Android one was launched through the e-commerce sites and clearly it was not a well thought approach. Low internet penetration and lack of supply chain infrastructure made it difficult to reach the target customer. But finally the traditional retailer came into the picture later in the month of September and it is something to cheer about.


Above all, the current set of Android One smartphones failed to deliver value to the Indian customers. It is not only the OS, to make a decent product a good combination of both hardware and software are required. Currently Google is collaborating with big global players like HTC, Lenovo to provide Android One. Hope they will do well in Indian market by fulfilling the need of the target customer.